At 4:00 a.m. I opened the door to pick up my newspapers as I was roaming the house waiting for my stuffy nose to clear. Ordinarily our faithful paper deliverer has them chucked right up by my door by 4:00 a.m. or, at the most, 5 after. Not taking into account that today is Labor Day, I realized that she might be a tad later this morning, which was fine by me.
During my wait for the papers, I began serious meditation exercises on whether it is best to read e-newspapers or paper newspapers. Personally, I read both. When we lived in the east, I always loved Sundays after church when we could pick up the Sunday NYTimes and Washington Post. The Sunday Times probably weighed about 30 pounds and required 10 trees per issue to produce, and the Post maybe about half that much. Then I was assured of a full afternoon of going through the papers, section by section without the encumbrance of a computer, an iPad, an iPod, a Blackberry, or a myriad other itty-bitty electronic formats that would digest 30 pounds of NYTimes and display it for me in e-ink. I tried an e subscription to USA Today and decided I liked paper better.
Then I thought, what if we all quit taking paper papers? The green folks would be thrilled because we would save all of those trees. But then consider, during this economic slowdown, so to speak, what would happen to the market value of goods and services produced domestically (GDP)? First, the loggers would be laid off. Then the log truckers. Then the paper and pulp mills would have to cut back. The paper haulers would be next to starve. The printing presses would crank to a minimal output of newspapers. The ink and chemical makers would die. And how about my faithful paper delivering lady? My sister Judy delivered the daily O in Olympia WA for over 20 years, wearing out a set of brake linings every two weeks or so as she screeched to a daily halt in front of dozens of rural paper delivery boxes. What about the gas and car repair folks who keep the paper delivery people going? And then there are the trash and recycling people. Granted, we would like to diminish trash and such, but then how many of these people would lose their jobs? The green folks could all get hired to go out and replant forests since a lot of the wood going to pulp needs cleaned out of the forests anyway.
Now look at the e-newspaper producers. All they have to worry about is whether readers have a multitude of electronic devices to read their e-paper. Newspaper companies wouldn't have to pay a penny for any of these electronic marvels. And since most people who subscribe to e-stuff already have a half dozen e-readers anyway, the net impact on GDP could, horror upon horrors, actually be negative! So the new e-paper revolution could proceed unabated out of, literally, thin air called e-ink.
So think about it. If you are serious about stimulating the economy, which choice is economically most critical? Would you feel right about putting all of those people and companies out of work as you snooze through the e-edition of your newspaper? And do you think it would be fun to do the NY Times crossword puzzle on your e-reader? Total incomes could conceivably decline, followed by declines in spending, employment, tax revenue, and increases in the federal deficit. Congress would have something else to do, and the bloviators could bloviate anew about how X or Y Political party has caused another mess.
But such is the price of economic progress. There are still a few harness makers around, but not many. Only a precious few buggy makers. No makers of mechanical calculators, engineering slide rules, and only a few suppliers of coal stoves. The unemployed and displaced people resulting from this electronic revolution will all have to go back to school, receive unemployment benefits, move in with parents and grandparents, lose their houses, declare bankruptcy, get food stamps, and join the Tea Party, whatever that is. Meanwhile, some 18 year old kid will invent another electronic marvel that will keep everyone occupied full time Twittering, Tweeting, Texting, Facebooking, Blogging, mini-blogging,MySpacing, while twiddling with their iPads, iPods, Blackberries, Droids, and other electronic marvels. Truth is, no one will have time to work anyway. Stay tuned for latest developments. One would only hope that somewhere everyone would take an e-economics course to cut down the gross levels of economic ignorance that are responsible for much of the economic dilemma we face today. The end. For now.
Recent Comments